Discussion - Dissertation Example In order to find the answer to this question, it is important to consider that whether the Saudis were provided a fair and equal opportunity to evaluate the two sides of the Bahraini conflict through analyzing the themes of the news and the leading stories published in the Saudi print media by drawing the information acquired from the content analysis and interpreting it in the wake of the various press theories. 6.1 The Performance of the Saudi Print Media during the Bahraini conflict In the analysis of the Saudi print media performance, the discussion here take in to account the news content that have been published in Al yaum Newspaper and in Al Riyadh Newspaper during the occurrence of protests and riots at the streets of Bahrain. ... Previously in this study, it has been mentioned that the coverage of the conflict in Bahrain by the Saudi Arabian press would depend extensively on the domestic sources in comparison to the foreign sources, which may be true by looking at each source individually, however, the Saudi print media seemed to be more dependent over the SPA as compared to any other single source. Since the Saudi media is indirectly governed or supervised by the Saudi Arabian government, thus this dependence was anticipated, and it is the duty of the press to carry out the agenda of the government through briefings from the SPA that lies under the supervision of Saudi Arabian Ministry of Information. Nevertheless, if the information sources are conglomerated into external and domestic sources, it get evident that the Saudi Arabian print media relied more on external sources, specifically on AFP, Reuters, UPI, AP, and other such agencies as compared to domestic sources. It is expected that this would impact the geographical perspective of the news coverage by the Saudi media, which suggests that it would emphasize over some areas of the world while neglecting the others. This is specifically significant provided the frequent research findings that the material of the Saudi media was more influential in topics that relate to the Bahraini conflict about which the readers in Saudi Arabia were ill-informed previously In fact, it was clearly found that the Saudi Arabian print media coverage of the Bahraini conflict emphasized more on to stories that emerged from the Middle East, the Western Europe, the USA, and other such foreign locations in comparison to those that emerge in the Saudi Arabia. The findings of the content analysis have been provided below: The first question: What is the
0 Comments
12/12/2019 0 Comments Impact of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)Impact of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was a historic point sacred law instance of the US Supreme Court. It maintained state racial segregation laws for open offices under the tenet of Separate but equal. Separate but equal stayed standard teaching in U.S. law until its disavowal in the 1954 Supreme Court choice Brown v. Board of Education. After the Supreme Court administering, the New Orleans Committee of Citizens, which had brought the suit and had orchestrated Homer Plessys capture in the act of crime to test Louisianas segregation law, expressed, We, as freemen, still believe that we were correct and our cause is sacred. The choice was passed on by a vote of 7 to 1 with the dominant part feeling composed by Justice Henry Billings Brown and the dissent composed by Justice John Marshall Harlan. Â Â In summary of the Opinion of the Court, Justice Brown proclaimed, We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiffs argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not because of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. Justice Brown additionally referred to a Boston case maintaining segregation based schools. While the Court did not discover a distinction in quality between the whites-just and blacks-just railroad trains, this was plainly untrue because most other separate offices, for example, open toilets, bistros, and government funded schools, where the offices assigned for blacks were reliably of lesser quality than those for whites. Justice John Marshall Harlan disagreed from the larger part sentiment. In an assessment that later got to be distinctly vital in the Brown v. Board of Education cases (1954), he contended that segregationist enactment, like the Louisiana law for this situation, depended on the presumption that colored residents are so second-class and debased that they cant be permitted to sit in public coaches involved by white individuals. These laws advanced and sustained the conviction that African Americans were mediocre compared to whites, as per Justice Harlan. They should be struck down, he contended, since the legislature proved unable allow the seeds of race hate to be planted under the authority of the law. Justice Harlan trusted that the constitution must be colorblind, and that it could permit no superior, overwhelming decision class of citizens. Because segregation had the impact of making such classes, he judged, it was unlawful. Plessy addressed the state laws setting up racial segregation in the South and gave a driving force to further segregation laws. It additionally addresses laws in the North requiring racial segregation as in the Boston school segregation case noted by Justice Brown as he would see it. Administrative achievements won amid the Reconstruction Era were eradicated through methods for the separate but equal teaching. The regulation had been fortified likewise by a 1875 Supreme Court choice that restricted the central governments capacity to mediate in state undertakings, ensuring to Congress just the power to control states from demonstrations of racial separation and segregation. The decision essentially allowed states administrative resistance when managing inquiries of race, ensuring the states entitlement to execute racially isolate foundations, requiring them just to be equal. I believe this was the correct choice made by the Supreme Court, since this case prompted Martin Luther King Jrs. development for equality, unity, safety and well-being for all individuals in the United States, and Brown v. Leading group of instruction, permitting colored and white students to reside in the same schools. Railroad car for whites vs colored: Justice Harlan The Great Dissenter: Sources used: http://landmarkcases.org/en/Page/436/Summary_of_the_Decision http://sageamericanhistory.net/reconstruction/documents/Harlan.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/supreme-court-rules-in-plessy-v-ferguson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson |